Eldridge (author of Wild At Heart) is writing to men, and given his selection of metaphors, white men.. he did mention that women can read it to gain some insight into what men can and should become, implying many of them are wimping out; which I think says that male passivity isn't only a stereotypical Asian thing, but it's a male thing.. that was the premise of Crabb & Hudson's book, Silence Of Adam, which traces passivity all the way back to Adam in the garden, who was with Eve when she was tempted and fell into sin.. so just as Adam was passive, so are many (most?) men.... both of these books paint a picture of what manhood is, tho' stereotypically, men either go to the aggressive and abusive extreme, or the passive extreme.. neither of which is particularly attractive to women, right?
The thing about the heroes of the stories like Braveheart and Gladiator, it's easy to see the strength of the men who fought the battle that were forced upon them.. but in the world today, what is the battle? What kind of a purpose to battle is the average man supposed to fight? And how would that battle be attractive to women? (certainly you don't mean to compete for the affection of a woman.. :) )
Friday, January 24, 2003
conversations that overflowed from talking about relationships - cf. original email exchange captured as the Relationship Theory dialogue
about team
Christine
female, 30yo; single and currently dating; Chinese-American. Enjoys journaling
and good relationship movies. Finds relationships interesting because of the
behaviors/motivations/thought processes which guide our interactions with each other.
djchuang
male, 36yo; married 7 yrs w/ 1 child; Chinese-American.
Enjoys dialogue and hangin' out with people. Interested in talking about relationships
because relationships are the most valuable thing in life, and we can't have too many of them.
More about me at www.djchuang.com
Previous Posts
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home